Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/content/06/6127406/html/wp-content/plugins/top-posts-this-month/topthismonth.php:34) in /home/content/06/6127406/html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Product Manager vs. Product Management (part 3) http://onproductmanagement.net/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/ Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:56:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Happy (belated) birthday to us (again)! | On Product Management http://onproductmanagement.net/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-6732 Happy (belated) birthday to us (again)! | On Product Management Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:31:23 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/#comment-6732 [...] Manager vs. Product Management Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [...] [...] Manager vs. Product Management Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [...]

]]>
By: Product Manager vs. Product Management (part 5) « On Product Management http://onproductmanagement.net/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-6041 Product Manager vs. Product Management (part 5) « On Product Management Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:49:59 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/#comment-6041 [...] Product Manager vs. Product Management (part 3) | On Product Management // June 5, 2010 at 10:25 pm [...] [...] Product Manager vs. Product Management (part 3) | On Product Management // June 5, 2010 at 10:25 pm [...]

]]>
By: Carolyn http://onproductmanagement.net/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2625 Carolyn Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:27:38 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/#comment-2625 I couldn't agree more. Project management should report directly to senior management. In many cases, the project is managed by an outsource company who are experts in managing and creating the awesome results. Decisions that the project manager has to make are that of senior management feedback and the PM should not have to go through channels in order to get the proper information. This could seriously delay a project! I couldn’t agree more. Project management should report directly to senior management. In many cases, the project is managed by an outsource company who are experts in managing and creating the awesome results. Decisions that the project manager has to make are that of senior management feedback and the PM should not have to go through channels in order to get the proper information. This could seriously delay a project!

]]>
By: Product Manager vs. Product Management (part 1) « On Product Management http://onproductmanagement.net/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2631 Product Manager vs. Product Management (part 1) « On Product Management Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:26:38 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/#comment-2631 [...] Articles Product Manager vs. Product Management (part 2) Product Manager vs. Product Management (part 3) Product Manager vs. Product Management (part [...] [...] Articles Product Manager vs. Product Management (part 2) Product Manager vs. Product Management (part 3) Product Manager vs. Product Management (part [...]

]]>
By: Product Manager vs. Product Management (part 4) « On Product Management http://onproductmanagement.net/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2630 Product Manager vs. Product Management (part 4) « On Product Management Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:21:21 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/#comment-2630 [...] I received a number of requests for the “20 page document” mentioned in the part 3 of this series that defines the activities in the Product Management Deliverables grid. (see [...] [...] I received a number of requests for the “20 page document” mentioned in the part 3 of this series that defines the activities in the Product Management Deliverables grid. (see [...]

]]>
By: Charlie Wicks http://onproductmanagement.net/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2632 Charlie Wicks Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:32:17 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/#comment-2632 Please send me the 20 page supporting documentation supporting your PM chart. Thanks, Charlie Wicks Please send me the 20 page supporting documentation supporting your PM chart.

Thanks,

Charlie Wicks

]]>
By: saeed http://onproductmanagement.net/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2624 saeed Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:28:17 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/#comment-2624 Jon, Thanks for the comment. One point of clarification. The Sustaining column (probably could be better titled Ongoing) lists some activities that occur on a regular basis throughout the development cycle. The diagram didn't make that clear. Thus Competitive assessments, for example, don't just happen at the end after GA, but are part of an ongoing process. I may be a bit hardcore on the org structure. I've worked in companies where PM was part of Marketing, part of Development as well as it's own separate function. And while it CAN work while part of other orgs, it will work BEST when it is run as a separate entity, with an experienced VP level executive overseeing it. If PM is truly a strategic function critical to a company's success (as is ofter heard said), why wouldn't it be treated that way? As for "orthogonal" -- I'm glad you appreciated it's use. It's an old habit from my days as a physics undergrad. Saeed Jon,

Thanks for the comment.

One point of clarification. The Sustaining column (probably could be better titled Ongoing) lists some activities that occur on a regular basis throughout the development cycle. The diagram didn’t make that clear. Thus Competitive assessments, for example, don’t just happen at the end after GA, but are part of an ongoing process.

I may be a bit hardcore on the org structure. I’ve worked in companies where PM was part of Marketing, part of Development as well as it’s own separate function. And while it CAN work while part of other orgs, it will work BEST when it is run as a separate entity, with an experienced VP level executive overseeing it. If PM is truly a strategic function critical to a company’s success (as is ofter heard said), why wouldn’t it be treated that way?

As for “orthogonal” — I’m glad you appreciated it’s use. It’s an old habit from my days as a physics undergrad.

Saeed

]]>
By: Jon Gatrell http://onproductmanagement.net/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2623 Jon Gatrell Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:59:29 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/#comment-2623 I'm not sure I would wait until the end of the process for competitive intelligence. I think competitive understanding and work is a first step in validating a market. I agree on the pragmatic model being a little too abstract, but I think effective product managers have to be both a little bit product marketers and alot of product management. While I think your organizational assessment is a little too rigid, I in principle agree that a seat at the executive table is needed, but it can work in marketing. Related: Market sizing/planning - http://launchclinic.com/blog/2007/08/17/know-your-market-sizing-matters-so-does-credibility/ Related: Product Management Org/Execution - http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2007/08/26/crossfunctional-product-management-preso/ Thanks for the article and thanks for using orthogonal - I love it when folks can use that. I’m not sure I would wait until the end of the process for competitive intelligence. I think competitive understanding and work is a first step in validating a market. I agree on the pragmatic model being a little too abstract, but I think effective product managers have to be both a little bit product marketers and alot of product management.

While I think your organizational assessment is a little too rigid, I in principle agree that a seat at the executive table is needed, but it can work in marketing.

Related: Market sizing/planning – http://launchclinic.com/blog/2007/08/17/know-your-market-sizing-matters-so-does-credibility/

Related: Product Management Org/Execution – http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2007/08/26/crossfunctional-product-management-preso/

Thanks for the article and thanks for using orthogonal – I love it when folks can use that.

]]>
By: saeed http://onproductmanagement.net/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2626 saeed Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:47:00 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/#comment-2626 Melissa, I can forward a version of the document to you, but please send your email to us at "info at eigenpartners dot com" Also, if you are new, please take a look at the series of articles I wrote on how to be a GREAT product manager. There are six articles and one wrap up article -- the first on the page -- that links them together. http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/category/other/great-pm/ Saeed Melissa,

I can forward a version of the document to you, but please send your email to us at “info at eigenpartners dot com”

Also, if you are new, please take a look at the series of articles I wrote on how to be a GREAT product manager. There are six articles and one wrap up article — the first on the page — that links them together.

http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/category/other/great-pm/

Saeed

]]>
By: Melissa http://onproductmanagement.net/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2627 Melissa Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:43:04 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/product-manager-vs-product-management-part-3/#comment-2627 Hi Saeed, your articles are very interesting and helpful. You mentioned above that you have a 20 page document to back up your product management deliverables diagram. I'm very interested to see this document. Could you send it to me or send me a link to it? I'm new to the profession and could use all the help I can get. Thanks! Hi Saeed, your articles are very interesting and helpful. You mentioned above that you have a 20 page document to back up your product management deliverables diagram. I’m very interested to see this document. Could you send it to me or send me a link to it? I’m new to the profession and could use all the help I can get. Thanks!

]]>