Thanks,
Charlie Wicks
]]>Thanks for the comment.
One point of clarification. The Sustaining column (probably could be better titled Ongoing) lists some activities that occur on a regular basis throughout the development cycle. The diagram didn’t make that clear. Thus Competitive assessments, for example, don’t just happen at the end after GA, but are part of an ongoing process.
I may be a bit hardcore on the org structure. I’ve worked in companies where PM was part of Marketing, part of Development as well as it’s own separate function. And while it CAN work while part of other orgs, it will work BEST when it is run as a separate entity, with an experienced VP level executive overseeing it. If PM is truly a strategic function critical to a company’s success (as is ofter heard said), why wouldn’t it be treated that way?
As for “orthogonal” — I’m glad you appreciated it’s use. It’s an old habit from my days as a physics undergrad.
Saeed
]]>While I think your organizational assessment is a little too rigid, I in principle agree that a seat at the executive table is needed, but it can work in marketing.
Related: Market sizing/planning – http://launchclinic.com/blog/2007/08/17/know-your-market-sizing-matters-so-does-credibility/
Related: Product Management Org/Execution – http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2007/08/26/crossfunctional-product-management-preso/
Thanks for the article and thanks for using orthogonal – I love it when folks can use that.
]]>I can forward a version of the document to you, but please send your email to us at “info at eigenpartners dot com”
Also, if you are new, please take a look at the series of articles I wrote on how to be a GREAT product manager. There are six articles and one wrap up article — the first on the page — that links them together.
http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/category/other/great-pm/
Saeed
]]>