Comments on: Agile/Scrum Software Development and Product Management http://onproductmanagement.net/2008/04/29/agiledev_and_pm/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:59:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: Agile/Scrum Software Development and Product Management part 2 | On Product Managementhttp://onproductmanagement.net/2008/04/29/agiledev_and_pm/comment-page-1/#comment-7789 Agile/Scrum Software Development and Product Management part 2 | On Product Management Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:45:52 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-7789 [...] Bhuwan, Ivan, Consultiq and Stacy all agreed with my position that the Product Manager shouldn’t be the Product Owner (Scrum role) if the meant that the Product Manager had to attend daily stand-up meetings with Development. This would force the Product Manager to be a daily tactical decision maker and would make it even more difficult to get out of the office, meet with customers, partners and prospects and do the fundamental research that is needed to ensure that the future success of the product is addressed. [...] [...] Bhuwan, Ivan, Consultiq and Stacy all agreed with my position that the Product Manager shouldn’t be the Product Owner (Scrum role) if the meant that the Product Manager had to attend daily stand-up meetings with Development. This would force the Product Manager to be a daily tactical decision maker and would make it even more difficult to get out of the office, meet with customers, partners and prospects and do the fundamental research that is needed to ensure that the future success of the product is addressed. [...]

]]> By: Agile and Product Managementhttp://onproductmanagement.net/2008/04/29/agiledev_and_pm/comment-page-1/#comment-2763 Agile and Product Management Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:47:19 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-2763 [...] http://onproductmanagement.net/2008/04/29/agiledev_and_pm/ [...] [...] http://onproductmanagement.net/2008/04/29/agiledev_and_pm/ [...]

]]> By: Jim Hollandhttp://onproductmanagement.net/2008/04/29/agiledev_and_pm/comment-page-1/#comment-4948 Jim Holland Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:33:51 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-4948 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @onpm: @sjohnson717 @bogcorrigan - PM shouldn't change bcuz of diff sales/dev/mkt methodology. http://tr.im/agilepm1 [JH] AMEN!</span></span> RT @onpm: @sjohnson717 @bogcorrigan – PM shouldn’t change bcuz of diff sales/dev/mkt methodology. http://tr.im/agilepm1 [JH] AMEN!

]]> By: OnProductManagementhttp://onproductmanagement.net/2008/04/29/agiledev_and_pm/comment-page-1/#comment-4949 OnProductManagement Sat, 13 Jun 2009 22:21:22 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-4949 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@sjohnson717 @bogcorrigan - no PM shouldn't change bcuz of diff sales/dev/mkt methodology. http://tr.im/agilepm1 #prodmgmt #agile</span></span> @sjohnson717 @bogcorrigan – no PM shouldn’t change bcuz of diff sales/dev/mkt methodology. http://tr.im/agilepm1 #prodmgmt #agile

]]> By: Adam Bullied vs. Enthiosys: Don’t Fight! « On Product Managementhttp://onproductmanagement.net/2008/04/29/agiledev_and_pm/comment-page-1/#comment-2762 Adam Bullied vs. Enthiosys: Don’t Fight! « On Product Management Sat, 21 Feb 2009 05:02:31 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-2762 [...] is really interesting, as I wrote the following in one of my first posts on [...] [...] is really interesting, as I wrote the following in one of my first posts on [...]

]]> By: saeedhttp://onproductmanagement.net/2008/04/29/agiledev_and_pm/comment-page-1/#comment-2757 saeed Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:08:22 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-2757 Michael,Thanks for the comment. The outbound/inbound PM is one accommodation that works with Scrum. A few of questions for you if I may.1. How closely do you work with Inbound PM? 2. Are you colocated with them? 3. Do you report up into the same Directors/VPs? 4. What is your relationship with Product Marketing? 5. Where does your responsibility end and their's begin?ThanksSaeed Michael,

Thanks for the comment. The outbound/inbound PM is one accommodation that works with Scrum. A few of questions for you if I may.

1. How closely do you work with Inbound PM?
2. Are you colocated with them?
3. Do you report up into the same Directors/VPs?
4. What is your relationship with Product Marketing?
5. Where does your responsibility end and their’s begin?

Thanks

Saeed

]]> By: Michael Palmeterhttp://onproductmanagement.net/2008/04/29/agiledev_and_pm/comment-page-1/#comment-2756 Michael Palmeter Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:58:22 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-2756 We're using Scrum here for several projects. I am called (in Oracle-ese) an "outbound" PM, which basically means that my interest is customers, channels and the market. In our implementation of Scrum, I am not a "Product Owner" in Scrum terms. The "inbound' PM and the engineering manager are considered the Product Owners, and I am fortunatel that I rarely have the need to participate in anything directly related to Scrum. My interface with the engineering project is primarily via our requirements management system, where the business requirements for the release are captured and discussed. Those business requirements are used to feed the Scrum backlog and drive sprint planning. It appears to work quite well this way, and we are managing to carry out development sub-projects in the release with close cooperation between three sites and four different Scrum teams. We’re using Scrum here for several projects. I am called (in Oracle-ese) an “outbound” PM, which basically means that my interest is customers, channels and the market. In our implementation of Scrum, I am not a “Product Owner” in Scrum terms. The “inbound’ PM and the engineering manager are considered the Product Owners, and I am fortunatel that I rarely have the need to participate in anything directly related to Scrum. My interface with the engineering project is primarily via our requirements management system, where the business requirements for the release are captured and discussed. Those business requirements are used to feed the Scrum backlog and drive sprint planning. It appears to work quite well this way, and we are managing to carry out development sub-projects in the release with close cooperation between three sites and four different Scrum teams.

]]> By: Agile/Scrum and Product Management (part 3a) « On Product Managementhttp://onproductmanagement.net/2008/04/29/agiledev_and_pm/comment-page-1/#comment-2755 Agile/Scrum and Product Management (part 3a) « On Product Management Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:13:08 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-2755 [...] One point of confusion in the article above is the definition used for Product Owner in part 1. [...] [...] One point of confusion in the article above is the definition used for Product Owner in part 1. [...]

]]> By: MatHamlin.com » Blog Archive » links for 2008-12-07http://onproductmanagement.net/2008/04/29/agiledev_and_pm/comment-page-1/#comment-2758 MatHamlin.com » Blog Archive » links for 2008-12-07 Mon, 08 Dec 2008 07:00:42 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-2758 [...] Agile/Scrum Software Development and Product Management « On Product Management (tags: scrum agile productmanagement) Posted under Daily Links [...] [...] Agile/Scrum Software Development and Product Management « On Product Management (tags: scrum agile productmanagement) Posted under Daily Links [...]

]]> By: The Cranky Product Manager never fails to disappoint, plus a blog you should read | The Cranky Product Managerhttp://onproductmanagement.net/2008/04/29/agiledev_and_pm/comment-page-1/#comment-2759 The Cranky Product Manager never fails to disappoint, plus a blog you should read | The Cranky Product Manager Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:37:04 +0000 http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-2759 [...] and Product Management - Parts 1, 2, 3, 3a, and 4. (whew! lots of reading, but worth [...] [...] and Product Management – Parts 1, 2, 3, 3a, and 4. (whew! lots of reading, but worth [...]

]]>