Product Management Metrics (part 3)
So here it is, looong overdue, the continuation of this series of articles. I published Part 1 and Part 2 late last year. I also had part 2a back in May, related to an audio seminar I participated in with Tom Grant of Forrester Research.
I’m not sure why it’s taken me so long to get to part 3, but here it is.
The story thus far
Unlike departments such as Sales or Marketing, measuring the value and contribution of a Product Management team or department is difficult.
Product Management doesn’t directly build, market or sell product, but clearly contributes significantly to the success in all those areas.
The focus of Product Management is product success, but that changes depending on the product strategy and the stage in the lifecycle of a given product.
Given the broad scope of the work, the dynamics of different products, and the cross-functional nature of the role, how can Product Management measure it’s success.
A different view of the Product Lifecycle
A traditional Product Lifecycle diagram (for a successful product!)
looks something like this:
This is clearly a simplified diagram for illustrative purposes.
For any actual product, the stages such as Develop, Launch etc. would have different lengths of time, with the Maturity, and Decline stages being much longer than they are shown. The curve itself would also vary somewhat in shape and wouldn’t be a simple bell curve.
Each of these stages is fairly self explanatory, but if we look at the same diagram and replace the stage names with the main objective of each stage, the diagram becomes:
Described this way, it becomes much easier to identify the key Product Management goals and focus for each stage.
Build it
The focus is on developing the first version of a product or solution that addresses a market need for an identifiable set of target customers. This is typically an iterative process, starting with an initial hypothesis or seed of an idea and then working with a small set of early (pioneer) customers, learning from them as they are exposed to the product and incorporating that input back into the offering.
Nail it
Once the product is launched, Product Management focuses on gaining an even deeper understanding of use cases, product limitations, positioning and messaging issues, sales barriers, pricing issues and other blocking factors that would prevent rapid adoption of the product in the target market. Education is a factor here, both within the company as well as externally. Thus working with press, analysts, key partners and other influencers is very important.
Scale it
Once Product Management has “nailed it”, (maybe with version 1.2 of the product along with changes to the marketing, pricing etc. of the product), focus shifts to helping other parts of the company scale efforts and results. This can be tied into working with marketing, education, finance, sales channels etc. Additionally, changing market conditions, customer and partner feedback, and competitive issues will be used to drive the product development cycle.
Extend it
In my opinion, this is a very interesting phase of the product lifecycle, because there are many ways to extend a product beyond the original problem space and target market segment. But it takes a lot of discipline to properly decide how to proceed and many companies fail miserably at this stage. Some methods of extension include:
- technology– e.g. adding new platform support such as a port from Windows to Mac or Linux
- geography — e.g. international expansion or foreign language support
- market segments — e.g. a small business edition or other vertical market specific offering
- adjacent problems — e.g. like adding more blades to a Swiss Army knife
- channels – e.g. working with resellers, VARs, distributors, OEMs or other parties
Milk it
At a certain point, either due to market or technology changes, the return on investment in extending the product is not justifyable. And assuming the market for the product has not commoditized — i.e. with free or very cheap equivalent alternatives — a product can enter a “cash cow” phase where the company can “milk” it, by collecting revenues but with minimal investments.
At this point Product Management’s focus is on maximizing the (declining) revenue stream, minimizing expenditures, and defending against low cost alternatives or other threats. Traditionally software products in this stage have benefited from a large customer base, strong recurring maintenance revenue and low demand for product changes or investment.
End it
At some point, based on declining revenue, increased maintenance costs, related technology obsolecence or complete lack of demand, a decision is made to end-of-life (EOL) a product. For any established product, this can take a period many quarters or years depending on the product and market segment.
There is not a lot for Product Management to do in this phase except perform the business analysis for EOLing a product and have it approved by management. Once that is done, assuming an EOL process is defined, a number of tactical activities, usually undertaken by other teams, are performed to ensure a smooth transition for customers.
What’s next?
In the next part — and I promise it is NOT months away — I’ll dig further into each of these stages and focus on specific activities and metrics for Product Management.
Saeed
Related posts:
- Product Management Metrics (part 2a)
- Questions for Product Managers
- Product Management is spreading…technologists take note!
- Product Management Metrics (part 2)
- A Model and Metrics for Tracking Product Success






A new view of the product lifecycle: http://bit.ly/aM9kAl build it, nail it, scale it, extend it, milk it, end it
RT @saeedwkhan: New Post on Product Management Metrics – http://wp.me/pXBON-1E3 #prodmgmt #metrics #prodmktg
RT @productologist: RT @saeedwkhan: New Post on Product Management Metrics – http://wp.me/pXBON-1E3 #prodmgmt #metrics #prodmktg
Saeed
I like the simple naming switch to focus the intent and give weight to upcoming metrics. One could quibble over some of the names and specific activities in different situations, but I think you hit it right at the high level. Looking forward to the actual measures.
Thanks
Don
Don
Thanks. There could be some differences across the various stages, and there will given all the variables involved, but I do see these high level objectives as being generally accurate and the underlying activities as generally applicable.
On Product Management – Product Management Metrics (part 3) http://bit.ly/a2MUbf
Build it, Nail it, Scale it, Extend it, Milk it, End it. #prodmgmt metrics and lifecycle objecitves.- http://wp.me/pXBON-1E3 #prodmktg
RT @saeedwkhan: Build it, Nail it, Scale it, Extend it, Milk it, End it. #prodmgmt metrics and lifecycle objecitves.- http://wp.me/pXBON-1E3 #prodmktg
Shared Via GReader: Product Management Metrics (part 3) http://bit.ly/9eguzy
Product Management Metrics Review (4 parts) P1 http://bit.ly/MBrit P2 http://bit.ly/94mlMR P3 http://bit.ly/2LkZu P4 http://bit.ly/cAKpgm
One interesting area to drill into a bit more is the Milk It and End It stages. How many organizations shift investment out of R&D in the Milk It stage (justifiably increasing sales and marketing resources), without adequately implementing an exit strategy or next-gen solution? Legacy technology is always a challenge, particular in business models where software maintenance revenue is the cash-cow.
Nail it THEN scale it! I like Saaed's view of the product lifecyle. @ONPM http://bit.ly/a2MUbf #prodmgmt
RT @barbaragnelson: Nail it THEN scale it! I like Saaed's view of the product lifecyle. @ONPM http://bit.ly/a2MUbf #prodmgmt
Product Management Metrics: http://onproductmanagement.net/2010/08/25/product-management-metrics-part-3/ #prodmgmt
Product Management Metrics: http://onproductmanagement.net/2010/08/25/product-management-metrics-part-3/ #prodmgmt
I want to post quick hello and want to say appreciate for this good article.;)
RT @saeedwkhan: New Post on Product Management Metrics – http://wp.me/pXBON-1E3 #prodmgmt #metrics #prodmktg
Product Management Metrics (part 3) http://t.co/wwRvCAX via @onpm
Product Management Metrics (part 3) http://t.co/0R6Sk2k via @onpm
RT @onpm: Product Management Metrics (part 3) ##prodmgmt http://bit.ly/aXqzP7
So – where’s part 4?
Jon
Guilty as charged. I’ve been completely lagging on the follow up. I honestly don’t know why this set of posts have been such a tough one to complete. Thanks for the reminder. I’ll look to get to it in the coming weeks.
Simple product management perspective: Build it, nail it, scale it, extend it, milk it, end it. http://bit.ly/f9gEbG #in
[...] in my post Product Management Metrics (part 3), I talked about the stages of the product lifecycle and how each stage had different objectives. [...]
Nice framework, but with a couple exceptions you never actually suggested any specific, objective, metrics for measuring product management.
In my opinion, there are no readily measurable objective metrics for PM. As you point out, it’s too dynamic over time and doesn’t lend itself to trend lines, etc.
Not to mention, the typical product mgr has 100% responsibility and 0% authority. ;-} So much depends on his/her influence, but much is beyond his/her control.
Thanks for the article, I look forward to some specific metrics in Part 4!
Scott, thanks for the comment, and you are correct. I actually continued the series with a brand new set of posts that do get into specific metrics etc. The first part is here.
http://onproductmanagement.net/2011/04/18/a-model-and-metrics-for-tracking-product-success/
Saeed